Skip to main content

The Constructionist-Integration Model of Reading















The Constructionist-Integration (Kintsch, 1988; 2004) Model of Reading comprehension (CI) sounds like it may be a construction crew out building libraries or bookstores, but it is really a model of how working memory constructs meaning by assembling propositions (sentences or meaning units like phrases).  This model is from the constructivist school of thought, which espouses the idea that we create meaning from the world around us rather than discover a meaning that was intended from the beginning.  In other words, a reader brings his or her background knowledge to the text, and in that manner, he or she will have a unique reading experience no matter the book.  If a sentence says "dog," one child might envision a poodle while another envisons a pit bull.  Therefore, each reader interacts with and experiences the text differently.

In order to understand this model, it is necessary to understand some key terminology.

  • textbase or microstructure--the current proposition and 2-3 surrounding sentences
  • macrostructure--the gist of the text as a whole
  • situation model--a mental model of the text as it is being read; the reader visualizes the text using his/her background knowledge and supplies details where the details are scant.  For example, a reader might think of the smell of an apple pie in the story even if the smell hasn't been discussed.  Because situation models are unique to the individual, they vary from reader to reader.
  • local coherence--thought to be the main goal of the comprehension process in a minimalist model; a reader will make a minimal amount of inferences to connect seemingly unrelated sentences, for example. Local coherence is maintained with propositions that are in close proximity to one another.
  • global coherence--  thought to be the process used in a constructionist model; the reader is continually making inferences as he/she reads in an effort to make sense of the text of the whole and even retrieves previously suppressed material as it becomes relevant.
Context plays a pivotal role in the construction of propositions.  According to Kintsch (1983) and his macro rules that govern the encoding of propositions, context determines what meanings are quickly suppressed, what propositions are deleted from the microstructure, if a series of propositions can be reduced to one general statement, or if one proposition activates another (i.e. inferring "school" from "grades").  Because English has so many polysemous words, context is key to processing the meaning of a text, as Adams (1990) inclusion of  a context processor in her reading model indicates.


Kintsch


For further reading:
Inference Generation and Cohesion in the Construction of Situation Models:  Some Connections with Computational Linguistics  (Graesser et al., 2007)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decoding the Babble: Navigating the Educational Jargon Jungle Top Ten +1 Phrases Decoded with a Wink and a Smile

Top Ten (+1) Educational Acronyms Decoded (with a wink and a smile)  Oh, education – the world of mysteries wrapped in a labyrinth of acronyms, jargon, and phrases that seem like they were concocted by a secret society of linguists with a penchant for confusion. We've all been there, trying to decipher the meaning behind an acronym that appears as inscrutable as ancient hieroglyphics.   "Don't forget to bring your list of IEP, ML, and 504 students to the PLC meeting today where we will determine who needs Tier 2 or 3 interventions in MTSS and we might write PEPs, too!" But, fear not, dear readers, for today, we embark on a comical journey into the land of bewildering educational jargon. 1. I EP – Infinite Enigma Puzzle Picture this: a group of educators huddled in a dimly lit room, chanting incantations, and crafting an IEP (Individualized Education Plan) for a student. But, what does it really stand for? "Incredibly Elusive Proclamation?" "Infinite Eni

Unlocking Creative Brilliance with Digital Magnetic Poetry: Teach Syntax, Diction, and Tone

Originally published 1/14/2009.  Updated 11/4/2023 The possibilities are infinite--ish when you use online magnets to get creative. No refrigerator necessary. Free online kits here . Poetry, with its mesmerizing ability to encapsulate emotions, stories, and ideas within the boundaries of words, is a true art form. But there's a particular type of poetry that holds a special place in my heart—the kind that challenges our traditional understanding of language and syntax. I'm talking about magnetic poetry, the quirky, wordplay-filled realm where creativity knows no bounds. I love this type of poetry! It really makes me think in a different syntax, playing with a strange juxtaposition of words. Often, I use this format when I am bored or if I have NO IDEA what I want to write about! The beauty of magnetic poetry lies in its simplicity and boundless potential for creativity. It's an art form where words become movable puzzle pieces, waiting to be rearranged into poetic masterpi

Making the Standards Explicit: North Carolina Standard Course of Study English II Guided Notes, Graphic Organizers

  When students are able to clearly articulate what they are learning and what they are expected to do, they will be more successful.  I have been teaching for 22 years, and I have found that it is helpful to begin each new unit of learning by emphasizing a focus standard.  We know that the ELA standards are artfully intertwined, but picking a standard or two to really emphasize helps me to be intentional about instruction and for students to know the purpose of their learning. I am currently teaching English II in North Carolina, and I am helping students prepare for the North Carolina Final Exam.  I have been developing slideshows, guided notes, and graphic organizers to help students understand the academic vocabulary of the tested standards as well as to help them analyze informational and literary texts in the 9-10 grade band. These resources are available individually or bundled on Teachers Pay Teachers .   Add a free copy of   RL.9.10.1 Literary Inferences Textual Evidence Graph